Preoblikovanje prehodov mladih: digitalni prostori, družbene vezi in vloga socialne pedagogike
Povzetek
Prehodi mladih, ki so bili nekoč razumljeni kot linearno napredovanje od izobraževanja k zaposlitvi, osamosvojitvi in k ustvarjanju družine, postajajo vse bolj razdrobljeni, podaljšani in negotovi. Globalizacija, individualizacija, prekarnost trga dela in digitalizacija so temeljito spremenile okoliščine odraščanja. Prehodi danes potekajo v hibridnih družbenih svetovih, v katerih se spletne izkušnje in izkušnje v živo neločljivo prepletajo. Digitalni prostori pri tem niso samo nevtralna orodja, ampak sociotehnična okolja, ki sooblikujejo identiteto, pripadnost in dostop do priložnosti, hkrati pa prinašajo nova tveganja in poglabljajo neenakosti. V teoretičnem članku prehode mladih na novo konceptualiziramo z vidika družbenih odnosov v digitaliziranem vsakdanu in socialne pedagogike. Osvetlimo premik od vnaprej začrtanih poti k nelinearnim življenjskim potekom, ki lahko v določenih okoliščinah privzamejo rizomatsko obliko. Digitalno participacijo obravnavamo kot utelešeno in afektivno prakso, vpeto v omrežja, ob tem pa preučujemo, kako se lahko socialna pedagogika s svojo usmerjenostjo v odnose, participacijo in v družbeno pravičnost odziva na kompleksnost hibridnih prehodov. Predlagani večdimenzionalni okvir rizomatskih prehodov povezuje štiri analitično ločene, vendar dinamično prepletene vidike: 1) rizomatske poti; 2) hibridno prostorskost in sociomaterialno prepletenost; 3) odnosno in etično usmerjenost; 4) kritično zmožnost delovanja v digitalnih okoljih, vključno s t. i. digigraspingom. Okvir teh vidikov ne obravnava samo vzporedno, ampak pojasnjuje, kako strukturni pogoji in značilnosti platform oblikujejo možnosti in omejitve v vsakdanjem življenju, kako odnosna podpora vpliva na njihovo razumevanje in kako lahko zmožnost delovanja v digitalnih okoljih preusmeri nadaljnje poti. Okvir ponuja konceptualna izhodišča za raziskovanje, strokovno delo in za oblikovanje politik. Z umeščanjem socialne pedagogike v življenjske poteke, ki jih vse bolj sooblikujejo digitalni mediji, članek razvija v prihodnost usmerjen pristop h krepitvi zmožnosti mladih za delovanje ter k spodbujanju pravičnosti in pripadnosti v sodobnih procesih prehajanja.
Prenosi
Literatura
Ahn, D., & Shin, D.-H. (2013). Is the social use of media for seeking connectedness or for avoiding social isolation? Mechanisms underlying media use and subjective well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2453–2462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.022
Alberti, G., Bessa, I., Hardy, K., Trappmann, V., & Umney, C. (2018). In, against and beyond precarity: work in insecure times. Work, Employment and Society, 32(3), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018762088
Andreassen, R., Petersen, M. N., Harrison, K., & Raun, T. (Eds.). (2017). Mediated intimacies: Connectivities, relationalities and proximities. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315208589
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Sage.
Bennett, A. (2015). ‘Speaking of youth culture’: A critical analysis of contemporary youth cultural practice. In D. Woodman & A. Bennett (Eds.), Youth cultures, transitions, and generations: Bridging the gap in youth research (pp. 42–55). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137377234_4
Bennett, A. (2018). Youth, music and DIY careers. Cultural Sociology, 12(2), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975518765858
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the cociology of knowledge. Penguin Books.
Biggart, A., & Walther, A. (2006). Coping with yo-yo-transitions. Young adults’ struggle for support, between family and state in comparative perspective. In C. Leccardi & E. Ruspini (Eds.), A new youth? Young people, generations and family life (pp. 41–62). Routledge.
Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Blackwell Publishers.
Chesters, J. (2023). Transitions between education and employment in the twenty-first century: A view from the Asia-Pacific. In W. O. Lee, P. Brown, A. L. Goodwin, & A. Green (Eds.), International handbook on education development in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 805–819). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6887-7_66
Chesters, J. (2024). Introduction to the research handbook on transitions into adulthood. In J. Chesters (Ed.), Research handbook on transitions into adulthood (pp. 1–13). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839106972
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand llateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.
Dewey, J. (1986). Experience and education. The Educational Forum, 50(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131728609335764
du Bois-Reymond, M. (1998). ‘I Don’t Want to Commit Myself Yet’: Young People’s Life Concepts. Journal of Youth Studies, 1(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.1998.10592995
du Bois-Reymond, M., & Blasco, A. L. (2003). Yo-yo transitions and misleading trajectories: Towards integrated transition policies for young adults in Europe. In A. L. Blasco, W. McNeish, & A. Walther (Eds.), Young people and contradictions of inclusion: Towards integrated transition policies in Europe (pp. 19–42). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781861345547.003.0002
Dufva, T., & Dufva, M. (2019). Grasping the future of the digital society. Futures, 107, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.11.001
Eckersley, R. (2011). A new narrative of young people’s health and well-being. Journal of Youth Studies, 14(5), 627–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2011.565043
Eriksson, L. (2014). The understandings of social pedagogy from northern European perspectives. Journal of Social Work, 14(2), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017313477325
Eurostat. (2015). Being young in Europe today: 2015 edition. Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.2785/59267
Furlong, A. (2016). The changing landscape of youth and young adulthood. In A. Furlong (Ed.), Routledge handbook of youth and young adulthood (2nd ed., pp. 3–11). Routledge.
Furlong, A., & Cartmel, F. (2007). Young people and social change: New perspectives. Open University Press.
Gabriel, F. (2014). Sexting, selfies and self-harm: Young people, social media and the performance of self-development. Media International Australia, 151(1), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1415100114
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Wiley.
Goffman, E. (2009). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. Transaction Publishers.
Gravett, K. (2021). Troubling transitions and celebrating becomings: From pathway to rhizome. Studies in Higher Education, 46(8), 1506–1517. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1691162
Hällgren, C., & Björk, Å. (2023). Young people’s identities in digital worlds. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 40(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-06-2022-0135
Hämäläinen, J. (2015). Defining social pedagogy: Historical, theoretical and practical considerations. The British Journal of Social Work, 45(3), 1022–1038. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct174
Hampton, K. N., Sessions, L. F., & Her, E. J. (2011). Core networks, social isolation, and new media: How Internet and mobile phone use is related to network size and diversity. Information, Communication & Society, 14(1), 130–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2010.513417
Harris, A., Cuervo, H., & Wyn, J. (2021). Thinking about belonging in youth studies. Palgrave Macmillan.
Honneth, A. (1996). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. MIT Press.
Janer, À., & Úcar, X. (2017). Analysing the dimensions of social pedagogy from an international perspective. European Journal of Social Work, 20(2), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1188782
Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400101
Kouhia, A., Kangas, K., & Kokko, S. (2021). The effects of remote pandemic education on crafts pedagogy: Opportunities, challenges, and interaction. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 11(Special Issue), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1126
Lavrič, M., & Deželan, T. (Eds.). (2021). Mladina 2020: Položaj mladih v Sloveniji [Youth 2020: The situation of young people in Slovenia]. University of Maribor Press, and University of Ljubljana Press. https://doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-475-0
Leccardi, C. (2005). Facing uncertainty: Temporality and biographies in the new century. YOUNG, 13(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308805051317
Lincoln, S. (2012). Youth culture and private space. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137031082
Lincoln, S. (2014). Young people and mediated private space. In A. Bennett & B. Robards (Eds.), Mediated youth cultures: The Internet, belonging and new cultural configurations (pp. 42–58). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137287021_4
Livingstone, S. (2011). Internet, children, and youth. In M. Consalvo & C. Ess (Eds.), The handbook of Internet studies (pp. 348–368). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444314861.ch16
Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. (2006). Regulating the Internet at home: Contrasting the perspectives of children and parents. In D. Buckingham & R. Willett (Eds.), Digital generations: Children, young people, and the new media (pp. 93–113). Routledge.
Lupton, D. (2016). Digital risk society. In A. Burgess, A. Alemanno, & J. Zinn (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of risk studies (pp. 301–309). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315776835
Mesch, G. S. (2009). The internet and youth culture. The Hedgehog Review, 11(1), 50–60.
Mortimer, J. T., & Moen, P. (2016). The changing social construction of age and the life course: Precarious identity and enactment of “early” and “encore” stages of adulthood. In M. J. Shanahan, J. T. Mortimer, & M. K. Johnson (Eds.), Handbook of the life course: Volume II (pp. 111–129). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20880-0_5
Oblak Črnič, T., Brečko, B. N., Koren Ošljak, K., & Plaskan, J. (2023). Medijska kultura in digitalni vsakdan mladih. Del 1: Prisotnost, rabe in regulacija digitalnih tehnologij v družinah in šolah: Poročilo raziskave v okviru ARRS projekta Medijski repertoarji mladih (J5-2564) [Media culture and the digital everyday life of youth. Part 1: Presence, use and regulation of digital technologies in families and schools: Research report within the ARRS project Youth Media Repertoires (J5-2564)]. FDV Publishing House. https://medijimladih.si/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/MRM_porocilo_web.pdf
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
Pattaro, C. (2015). New media & youth identity. Issues and research pathways. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 7(1), 297–327. https://doi.org/10.14658/PUPJ-IJSE-2015-1-12
Perla, L., Vinci, V., & Agrati, L. S. (2025). The Italian way to the Europeanisation of teacher education: An analysis of reforms and the ongoing experience of digital transformation. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 15(1), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1714
Pink, S., Ferguson, H., & Kelly, L. (2022). Digital social work: Conceptualising a hybrid anticipatory practice. Qualitative Social Work, 21(2), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250211003647
Pittman, M., & Reich, B. (2016). Social media and loneliness: Why an Instagram picture may be worth more than a thousand Twitter words. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.084
Poell, T., Nieborg, D., & van Dijck, J. (2019). Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1425
Robards, B. (2012). Leaving MySpace, joining Facebook: ‘Growing up’ on social network sites. Continuum, 26(3), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2012.665836
Semetsky, I. (2011). Becoming-other: Developing the ethics of integration. Policy Futures in Education, 9(11), 138–144. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2011.9.1.138
Stone, J., Berrington, A., & Falkingham, J. (2014). Gender, turning points, and boomerangs: Returning home in young adulthood in Great Britain. Demography, 51(1), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0247-8
Storø, J. (2013). Practical social pedagogy: Theories, values and tools for working with children and young people (1st ed.). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t89gms
Theodoridis, K., & Miles, S. (2024). Uncommon biographies: How social media provides young people with an experiential realm. In J. Chesters (Ed.), Research handbook on transitions into adulthood (pp. 237–249). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839106972.00031
Theodoridis, K., Miles, S., & Albertson, K. (2019). Negotiating reality through the prosumption of the ‘unreal’ self: Young people’s identities in an age of economic precarity. In E. Colombo & P. Rebughini (Eds.), Youth and the politics of the present: Coping with complexity and ambivalence (pp. 32–43). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429198267-3
Tinto, V. (1988). Stages of student departure: Reflections on the longitudinal character of student leaving. The Journal of Higher Education, 59(4), 438–455. https://doi.org/10.2307/1981920
Todorović, D., van der Linden, J., Sieckelinck, S., & Timmerman, M. C. (2025). Scrolling with young people: Transferring general youth work methods into digital spaces. Children and Youth Services Review, 177, Article 108468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108468
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
Twenge, J. M., Spitzberg, B. H., & Campbell, W. K. (2019). Less in-person social interaction with peers among U.S. adolescents in the 21st century and links to loneliness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(6), 1892–1913. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519836170
Ule, M. (2014). Spremembe vsakdanjega življenja in življenjskih potekov v sodobnih globaliziranih družbah [Changes in everyday life and life courses in contemporary globalised societies]. Teorija in praksa, 51(special issue), 309–327. University of Ljubljana Press. http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-GLJWBW0C
Ule, M. (2019). Življenjski svetovi mladih v času, ki pozablja na mlade [The life worlds of youth in a time that forgets young people]. Otrok in knjiga, 46(104), 8–14. https://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-HSV9N5W9
Vivitsou, M. (2019). Digitalisation in education, allusions and references. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 9(3), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.706
Wängqvist, M., & Frisén, A. (2016). Who am I online? Understanding the meaning of online contexts for identity development. Adolescent Research Review, 1(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-016-0025-0
Winman, T. (2020). The role of social pedagogy in a digitalized society. The Educational Review, USA, 4(3), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.26855/er.2020.03.004
Woodman, D., & Wyn, J. (2015). Youth and generation: Rethinking change and inequality in the lives of young people. SAGE.
Wyn, J., Lantz, S., & Harris, A. (2012). Beyond the ‘transitions’ metaphor: Family relations and young people in late modernity. Journal of Sociology, 48(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783311408971
Wyn, J., & Woodman, D. (2006). Generation, youth and social change in Australia. Journal of Youth Studies, 9(5), 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260600805713
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
